| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `ChewedKandi has certainly gone out of her way to keep the vector community on the right path. Always making sure that her talents are infinitely scalable, Sharon has put her bezier curves to excellent use, and firmly anchored herself as an inspirational leader. We're absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for June 2013 to `ChewedKandi. Congratulations, Sharon! Read More
|
Sta.sh
I also use a Panasonic, but my model (FZ35)does not have an interchangeable lens which would be really nice. Do you like your model? I am currently shopping for an upgrade.
No, I seldom use a tripode and this is as the others all hand held shots. I think the ISO is maybe a little bit to high but I want to have a focus to the front flower and the others a little bit blurry, so I choose the aperture with 5.6
But now to your second question. I like this camera, because it's not that heavy and a small one but with interchangeable lenses and good in handling because it's not too small. The lenses are also smaller and also not that heavy than others because of the micro four third technique.
All the shots you see with a focal length of 45 are taken with the macro lens (it's the Panasonic Leica DG Macro-Elmarit 45mm F2.8 ASPH OIS) and if you see a focal length of 200 it's taken with the telezoom lens (Panasonic 45-200 mm f4.0-5.6 LUMIX G VARIO Micro 4/3). Additionally I have a third lens for all other things, it's the Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f1.7 Aspherical Pancake.
I think that the quality is pretty o.k. especially because the camera/the lenses are not that expensive
There are also two groups here #Lumix-Club and #MicroFourThirds ... maybe you find there more information about the camera and the lenses
Good luck with the decision